La cámara logró capturar a un violador en el momento en que intentaba ingresar a una víctima por la fuerza a su domicilio con la intención de cometer abusos.
Impactantes imágenes… Muy fuertes.-
caray y a este syco cuantos dias de carcel le va a dar la tonta justicia peruana.??
no!!! si seguro que muchos jueces creen que se puede regenerar. Y lo soltaran en pocos meses `por buena conducta para que siga abusando de las pollitas. No ve que estos sycos son producto de la pobreza de la injusticia social, fueron abusados de ninos, pobrecitos.
No solo Comunicore: Susana Villarán le pedirá a Luis Castañeda Lossio explicaciones sobre obras en Lima
Para la postulante a la Alcaldía de Lima por Fuerza Social, será importante saber por qué se priorizó la ejecución de algunas obras. La reunión con el burgomaestre capitalino será el próximo martes
Domingo 29 de agosto de 2010 - 09:38 pm
En una misiva remitida al alcalde de Lima, Luis Castañeda Lossio, la aspirante a sucederlo en el cargo por Fuerza Social, Susana Villarán, le agradeció su invitación a la cita pactada para el martes próximo con el resto de candidatos y adelantó las interrogantes que le planteará en persona.
Según Villarán, una de sus principales preocupaciones en torno al gasto presupuestal del municipio de Lima, durante la gestión de Castañeda, pasa por conocer cuántas obras ejecutadas recibieron aprobación del Sistema Nacional de Inversión Pública (SNIP).
La postulante edil también tiene interés de conocer todo en relación con la inversión hecha para la construcción de los intercambios de las avenidas Universitaria con Venezuela, Eduardo de Habich y México, por ejemplo.
Para Susana Villarán, es importante saber por qué existe un bajo nivel de inversión en Lima tomando en cuenta el que se ha realizado en otras regiones.
Finalmente, la representante de Fuerza Social buscará saber las razones por las que se priorizó la ejecución de unas obras y dejándose otras de lado.
Es un político peruano, fundador y presidente del partido Justicia Nacional que en el 2010, ha sido incorporado como miembro de la Internacional Liberal. Tiene 47 años.
Es hijo del general Jaime Salinas Sedó. Estudió dos años en el Liceo Francés "Guillaume Apollinaire" en París-Francia, culminando sus estudios secundarios en el Colegio Franco-Peruano en diciembre de 1980. Se graduó como Bachiller en economía en julio de 1985 en la Universidad de Maryland y obtuvo su título de Master of Business Administration, MBA, en 1988 en la misma Universidad. Experto en Comercio Exterior, labor a la que se dedica hace cerca de 20 años. Asimismo, es un reconocido Conferencista Internacional (domina el Inglés, Francés y Español). Es reconocido como un defensor de la Libertad de las sociedades. En junio de 1988 regresa al Perú y funda una empresa orientada a la exportación de confecciones de algodón a los mercados internacionales alcanzando importantes ventas anuales. Luego del golpe de estado y cierre del Congreso de la República, realizado por Alberto Fujimori el 5 de abril de 1992, y como consecuencia del intento liderado por el General Salinas, su padre, por remover del poder a Fujimori el 13 de noviembre de ese mismo año, Salinas hijo es arrestado y acusado de terrorismo. Permaneció más de 30 días, detenido en la Dirección contra el Terrorismo. Luego de un mes de cautiverio una juez cambió la orden de detención definitiva, enviada por el gobierno, por una de comparecencia para que pudiese salir libre. Asilo y exilio Una vez en libertad, se asiló en la Embajada Argentina, partiendo el 19 de diciembre de 1992. En los casi tres años de exilio dedicó su tiempo para lograr la libertad de su padre y de los oficiales encarcelados en el castillo prisión de la Fortaleza del Real Felipe. Luego de meses de esfuerzo obtuvo resultados en las gestiones realizadas consiguiendo el apoyo de importantes figuras internacionales, tales como las del Ex Presidente de Costa Rica y premio Nóbel de la Paz Oscar Arias y del Ex Presidente de los Estados Unidos Jimmy Carter, dirigidas todas hacia el gobierno peruano solicitando la libertad del General Salinas Sedó y sus compañeros de prisión. Continuó en su lucha y consiguió luego de casi tres años del gobierno liberó al General Salinas Sedó el 16 de junio de 1995. Jaime Salinas ha sido recientemente director y conductor del programa televisivo Justicia Para Todos que se propaló por Red Global. Carrera política
Jaime Salinas en campaña. En enero de 1995 retornó al Perú para abogar por la libertad de su padre. Participó sin éxito como candidato al Congreso tanto en las elecciones de 1995 y 2000. En octubre de 1998 fue candidato a la Alcaldía del distrito de Miraflores por el "Movimiento Independiente Miraflores Unido", siendo derrotado por Luis Bedoya de Vivanco. Años después se conocería en un video donde aparece Bedoya de Vivanco con Vladimiro Montesinos que hubo fraude electoral en dicha elección. En octubre de 2001 fundó el Movimiento "Diálogo Vecinal" con el que postuló a la Alcaldía de Lima en noviembre del 2002, alcanzando más de medio millón de votos y el 16% de las preferencias electorales en la capital. Su partido obtuvo 5 regidores electos en Lima Metropolitana y 12 regidores distritales.
Actualmente, Jaime Salinas es el presidente del Partido Justicia Nacional (PJN), con el cual ha lanzó su candidatura a la Presidencia de la República en las Elecciones generales del Perú (2006), sin embargo quedó en 8vo lugar; en un inicio apareció como uno de los candidatos favoritos, pero la aparición de Ollanta Humala, calificado como radical y de tendencia Chavista, hizo que la centro derecha sea representada en Lourdes Flores, quien finalmente fue desplazada por el ex-presidente Alan García Pérez, quien vencería en segunda vuelta a Humala.
Jaime Salinas Lopez-Torres tenía, tiene este brillante curriculum. Su valiente padre intentó sacar a Fujimori del gobierno, lo hizo huir a la Embajada de Japon y esconderse en ella, ¿lo recuerdan no?. Jaime Salinas hijo ha cometido un gran error politico, en esta ensalada de Lourdes-SalazarMonroe. Escribio un correo a Jaime Baily, delatando a Lourdes Flores, pero no pensó que Baily lo publicara en su programa. Ahora Salinas niega haber enviado ese correo con argumentos muy infantiles, del que no sabe como es esto de la informática, mails, IPs. Es una lástima, pues es mejor un valiente sin partido que un cobarde y encima mentiroso.
Carlos Alberto Morales Paitán Pediatra - Hospital del Niño - Lima, Perú - Mobile: 999-185-042 Acceso directo a mi Blog: www.karlmoralesp2010.blogspot.com/
For Fatima Monkush, it would be a place to swim -- sans cap and layers of clothing -- with other Muslim women.
While the national debate about the center has elicited passionate statements for and against it from Democrats and Republicans, what Muslims have been left with is a great deal of disappointment. And for the young American-born New Yorkers who hope to use the site as a fitness center, meeting space and prayer hall, among other functions, the sense of rejection is personal.
"The debate is maybe the most unfortunate thing we've seen in a long time, to see Americans behave in such a manner," said Zahriyeh, 24, who was born and raised in Brooklyn. His parents are Palestinian Americans who immigrated to the city more than three decades ago.
He said the center has arisen from nothing more than the needs of his burgeoning community. "It's only natural that something like this should happen," he said. "Our community has grown over the last few decades."
For many Muslims outside New York, the center has become a symbol and the debate about it an affront, reflective of a lack of acceptance that they feel is growing in parts of the United States.
"We are at a cusp," said Haris Tarin, director of the Washington office of the Muslim Public Affairs Council. "The thing that has personally affected me the most is that the individuals who call this an act of insensitivity forget that Muslim Americans were victims on 9/11 also. Our country was attacked. Our neighbors were attacked. . . . Our faith was hijacked on that day."
Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, described the debate as a nadir in "Islamophobic rhetoric."
"We're seeing it nationwide," he said. "You literally cannot turn on a radio today without hearing a right-wing radio talk show host slamming Islam in the most corrosive of terms."
Open to all
The project's organizers have said that the center, called Park51, is modeled on Manhattan's 92nd Street Y, a community center open to all New Yorkers. Park51 is also intended to be open to the entire community, though there will be some restrictions based on Muslim traditions.
It would house meeting rooms, a fitness center, a swimming pool, a basketball court, a restaurant and culinary school, a library, a 500-seat auditorium, a Sept. 11 memorial, a reflection space, and a mosque that could attract as many as 2,000 worshipers on Fridays. There is no place like it in the city, which is home to 600,000 to 700,000 Muslims, according to Columbia University researchers.
There are an estimated 2.5 million Muslims in the United States, according to the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
La percepción de este problema subió del 30% en 2006 al 51% en el presente año.
Los 'faenones' de los lotes petroleros, las escandalosas adjudicaciones de tierra por parte de Cofopri, los viajes pagados que una universidad ofreció a congresistas y jueces, entre otras denuncias, parecen haber marcado fuertemente la imagen del segundo gobierno del presidente Alan García, pues la última Encuesta Nacional sobre Percepciones de la Corrupción en el Perú-2010 revela que el 51% de los peruanos percibe a la corrupción como uno de los principales problemas del país; esto es, 21 puntos más de lo que registró el mismo estudio en el año 2006.
Este sondeo, cuyos resultados completos serán presentados hoy por Proética, Ipsos Apoyo y la Confiep, arroja –en esa línea– que las instituciones más corruptas en el Perú son el Congreso de la República, la Policía Nacional, el Poder Judicial y el Gobierno Central.
Por otro lado, el estudio muestra la tendencia de la población a no denunciar las solicitudes de coimas –91% de los encuestados dice que no lo hace– para no hacerse problemas (22%) y porque no sirve para nada (21%).
También confirma que la mayoría de la población –el 82% de los 5,900 entrevistados entre el 14 de mayo y el 6 de junio– observa que los peruanos no suelen respetar las leyes. Solo un 12% piensa que sí lo hacen.
"La lucha anticorrupción no se puede hacer con mariconadas, sino con hombría suficiente (…) No voy a replegarme, vamos a seguir", dijo ante los miembros de dicho grupo de trabajo, al mostrar su malestar por el poco compromiso de varias autoridades que participan en la comisión que preside.
Por ejemplo, cuestionó al presidente del Tribunal Constitucional, Carlos Mesía, por expresar su deseo de renunciar a la comisión. Agregó que la Fiscal de la Nación, Gladys Echaíz, "tampoco está muy militante en esta línea". "Parece que no ha comprendido que esta comisión no sustituye a las intituciones", refirió.
En otro momento, criticó la inhibición a participar en este grupo que anunció el contralor Fuad Khoury, así como la poca participación que ha mostrado el alcalde de Lima, Luis Castañeda, quien solo envía un representante a las reuniones de la comisión.
The commander in chief this spring went on a campaign-style visit to promote his economic agenda, his plans for clean energy and the need for increased regulation of the financial system.
Remember NASA? It once represented to the world the apogee of American scientific and technological achievement. Here is President Obama's vision of NASA's mission, as explained by administrator Charles Bolden:
"One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science and math and engineering."
Apart from the psychobabble -- farcically turning a space-faring enterprise into a self-esteem enhancer -- what's the sentiment behind this charge? Sure America has put a man on the moon, led the information revolution, won more Nobel Prizes than any other nation by far -- but, on the other hand, a thousand years ago al-Khwarizmi gave us algebra.
Bolden seems quite intent on driving home this message of achievement equivalence -- lauding, for example, Russia's contribution to the space station. Russia? In the 1990s, the Russian space program fell apart, leaving the United States to pick up the slack and the tab for the missing Russian contributions to get the space station built.
For good measure, Bolden added that the United States cannot get to Mars without international assistance. Beside the fact that this is not true, contrast this with the elan and self-confidence of President John Kennedy's 1961 pledge that America would land on the moon within the decade.
There was no finer expression of belief in American exceptionalism than Kennedy's. Obama has a different take. As he said last year in France, "I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism." Which of course means: If we're all exceptional, no one is.
Take human rights. After Obama's April meeting with the president of Kazakhstan, Mike McFaul of the National Security Council reported that Obama actually explained to the leader of that thuggish kleptocracy that we, too, are working on perfecting our own democracy.
Nor is this the only example of an implied moral equivalence that diminishes and devalues America. Assistant Secretary of State Michael Posner reported that in discussions with China about human rights, the U.S. side brought up Arizona's immigration law -- "early and often." As if there is the remotest connection between that and the persecution of dissidents, jailing of opponents and suppression of religion routinely practiced by the Chinese dictatorship.
Nothing new here. In his major addresses, Obama's modesty about his own country has been repeatedly on display as, in one venue after another, he has gratuitously confessed America's alleged failing -- from disrespecting foreigners to having lost its way morally after 9/11.
It's fine to recognize the achievements of others and be non-chauvinistic about one's country. But Obama's modesty is curiously selective. When it comes to himself, modesty is in short supply.
It began with the almost comical self-inflation of his presidential campaign, from the still inexplicable mass rally in Berlin in front of a Prussian victory column to the Greek columns framing him at the Democratic convention. And it carried into his presidency, from his posture of philosopher-king adjudicating between America's sins and the world's to his speeches marked by a spectacularly promiscuous use of the word "I."
Notice, too, how Obama habitually refers to Cabinet members and other high government officials as "my" -- "my secretary of homeland security," "my national security team," "my ambassador." The more normal -- and respectful -- usage is to say "the," as in "the secretary of state." These are, after all, public officials sworn to serve the nation and the Constitution -- not just the man who appointed them.
It's a stylistic detail, but quite revealing of Obama's exalted view of himself. Not surprising, perhaps, in a man whose major achievement before acceding to the presidency was writing two biographies -- both about himself.
Obama is not the first president with a large streak of narcissism. But the others had equally expansive feelings about their country. Obama's modesty about America would be more understandable if he treated himself with the same reserve. What is odd is to have a president so convinced of his own magnificence -- yet not of his own country's.
A place is made sacred by a widespread belief that it was visited by the miraculous or the transcendent (Lourdes, the Temple Mount), by the presence there once of great nobility and sacrifice (Gettysburg), or by the blood of martyrs and the indescribable suffering of the innocent (Auschwitz).
When we speak of Ground Zero as hallowed ground, what we mean is that it belongs to those who suffered and died there -- and that such ownership obliges us, the living, to preserve the dignity and memory of the place, never allowing it to be forgotten, trivialized or misappropriated.
That's why Disney's 1993 proposal to build an American history theme park near Manassas Battlefield was defeated by a broad coalition that feared vulgarization of the Civil War (and that was wiser than me; at the time I obtusely saw little harm in the venture). It's why the commercial viewing tower built right on the border of Gettysburg was taken down by the Park Service. It's why, while no one objects to Japanese cultural centers, the idea of putting one up at Pearl Harbor would be offensive.
And why Pope John Paul II ordered the Carmelite nuns to leave the convent they had established at Auschwitz. He was in no way devaluing their heartfelt mission to pray for the souls of the dead. He was teaching them a lesson in respect: This is not your place; it belongs to others. However pure your voice, better to let silence reign.
Even New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who denounced opponents of the proposed 15-story mosque and Islamic center near Ground Zero as tramplers on religious freedom, asked the mosque organizers "to show some special sensitivity to the situation." Yet, as columnist Rich Lowry pointedly noted, the government has no business telling churches how to conduct their business, shape their message or show "special sensitivity" to anyone about anything. Bloomberg was thereby inadvertently conceding the claim of those he excoriates for opposing the mosque, namely that Ground Zero is indeed unlike any other place and therefore unique criteria govern what can be done there.
Bloomberg's implication is clear: If the proposed mosque were controlled by "insensitive" Islamist radicals either excusing or celebrating 9/11, he would not support its construction.
But then, why not? By the mayor's own expansive view of religious freedom, by what right do we dictate the message of any mosque? Moreover, as a practical matter, there's no guarantee that this couldn't happen in the future. Religious institutions in this country are autonomous. Who is to say that the mosque won't one day hire an Anwar al-Aulaqi -- spiritual mentor to the Fort Hood shooter and the Christmas Day bomber, and onetime imam at the Virginia mosque attended by two of the 9/11 terrorists?
An Aulaqi preaching in Virginia is a security problem. An Aulaqi preaching at Ground Zero is a sacrilege. Or would the mayor then step in -- violating the same First Amendment he grandiosely pretends to protect from mosque opponents -- and exercise a veto over the mosque's clergy?
Location matters. Especially this location. Ground Zero is the site of the greatest mass murder in American history -- perpetrated by Muslims of a particular Islamist orthodoxy in whose cause they died and in whose name they killed.
Of course that strain represents only a minority of Muslims. Islam is no more intrinsically Islamist than present-day Germany is Nazi -- yet despite contemporary Germany's innocence, no German of goodwill would even think of proposing a German cultural center at, say, Treblinka.
Which makes you wonder about the goodwill behind Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf's proposal. This is a man who has called U.S. policy "an accessory to the crime" of 9/11 and, when recently asked whether Hamas is a terrorist organization, replied, "I'm not a politician. . . . The issue of terrorism is a very complex question."
America is a free country where you can build whatever you want -- but not anywhere. That's why we have zoning laws. No liquor store near a school, no strip malls where they offend local sensibilities, and, if your house doesn't meet community architectural codes, you cannot build at all.
These restrictions are for reasons of aesthetics. Others are for more profound reasons of common decency and respect for the sacred. No commercial tower over Gettysburg, no convent at Auschwitz -- and no mosque at Ground Zero.
Build it anywhere but there.
The governor of New York offered to help find land to build the mosque elsewhere. A mosque really seeking to build bridges, Rauf's ostensible hope for the structure, would accept the offer.
